Marc Blum wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:29:35 +0100, Cris Carampa <cris119_at_operamail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>It seem a 10.2.0.2 patchset is not planned yet.
>>
>>Is 10.2.0.1 so bugfree? In the previous releases the first patchset
>>appeared sooner IIRC.
>
>
> Some of the many bugs I discovered in 10.2.0.1 are fixed in 10.2.0.2, which
> should be released in 12/2005.
>
> Bugfree? Take a close look at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE and do some arithmetics
> with this data type. And then take a deep breath.
>
> my 2 cts
>
> --
> Marc Blum
> mailto:blumXXXSPAMXXX_at_marcblum.de
> http://www.marcblum.de
Didn't say there were zero bugs. But compared with 10.1.x.x it is
no worse and in some respects far better.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Received on Tue Nov 15 2005 - 13:39:16 CST
