Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: SQL Server 2005 - Still not upto it
Aaron [SQL Server MVP] wrote:
>>This statement I disagree with.
As Stephen, I have to disagree with that you. Delivering performance within the defined constraints (the system must be able to support X transactions within m seconds; this transaction may not take longer than n seconds...; the system must meet this criteria for the next y years with a growth rate g in datavolume/transactions) is a functional requirement. Either you meet that requirement by designing for it, or you don't. Sometimes it might be impossible to meet some requirements (Cary Milsap has a very good example in his book on Oracle performance) but you don't tune after the fact.
And the analogy of a flintstone car holds perfectly well. Look at your own statement:
> I wouldn't consider a car that you "drive" with your feet fully functional.
Well, who said a car has to have an engine? My four-year-old son would be perfectly happy with the flintstone edition. Oh, well let's finetune and add an engine. Damn, now we need something to keep the fuel in. No worries, I can fix that....
If the requirement is that the car must reach a minimal speed you can either let it roll down a hill crying "See? it can reach 20 MPH, I didn't know you wanted to go uphill" or you design the car to reach that speed everytime upfront.
My 2 eurocents
Holger
Received on Wed Mar 16 2005 - 11:06:09 CST
![]() |
![]() |