In message <1110515403.704178_at_yasure>, DA Morgan
<damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> writes
>StenR wrote:
>
>> I didn't ask about the file system -
>> your original post claims that Veritas' clusterware (VCS) is costing
>> substantial unnecessary CPU and should be thrown away. What clusterware
>> do you suggest he use in stead? OP does not state that he is using a
>> Veritas file system in stead of NetApp's.
>
>NetApp has a clustered file system by default. My question was why one
>would pay money and CPU to put a clustered file system on top of what is
>already a clustered file system. I don't think that requires further
>explanation. Oracle provides clusterware in the 10g release: Use it.
Veritas cluster is more than just a clustered filesystem. What do you
suggest replaces it?
--
Jim Smith
Because of their persistent net abuse, I ignore mail from
these domains (among others) .yahoo.com .hotmail.com .kr .cn .tw
For an explanation see <http://www.jimsmith.demon.co.uk/spam>
Received on Fri Mar 11 2005 - 00:31:53 CST
