Re: Mirror redo logs

StenR wrote:

> I didn't ask about the file system -
> your original post claims that Veritas' clusterware (VCS) is costing
> substantial unnecessary CPU and should be thrown away. What clusterware
> do you suggest he use in stead? OP does not state that he is using a
> Veritas file system in stead of NetApp's.

NetApp has a clustered file system by default. My question was why one would pay money and CPU to put a clustered file system on top of what is already a clustered file system. I don't think that requires further explanation. Oracle provides clusterware in the 10g release: Use it.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)