Re: cursor result return

From: Cris Carampa <cris119_at_operamail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:01:08 +0100
Message-ID: <421b2d2a$0$6306$5fc30a8@news.tiscali.it>

DA Morgan wrote:

> Sybrand may well be correct about the difference ... but 9 seconds is
> unbelievably slow.

Doesn't it depend upon the number of columns selected? It takes 7 seconds here (9.0.1.3 on Linux) for a "select * from 4352-rows-table" and 1/3 second for a "select 1 from same-table".

Kind regards,

-- 
Cris Carampa (cris119_at_operamail.com)

"Torna il re. Prosegue l'attesa per fante e cavallo."
(da "Umanità Nova" n. 14 del 21 aprile 2002)

Received on Tue Feb 22 2005 - 07:01:08 CST