Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Db2, Oracle, SQL Server

Re: Db2, Oracle, SQL Server

From: hpuxrac <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: 18 Feb 2005 06:25:39 -0800
Message-ID: <1108736739.664824.109600@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


snip:

> Here we go again with the "remaster" nonsense...
> There is no "re-mastering" anything in RAC.
> Lose the term: it's incorrect for RAC. Clear?

Lose the attitude. Read 139435.1 and 144152.1

The process occurs whether you know about it or not and is used and described in oracle rac documentation.

> Not at all. There is 0 second impact on any other node
> not involved in the recovery. And there is 0 second
> impact on any other node while the rollback doesn't start.

After you read the oracle metalink notes and rac doc look at your answer above.

> There is NO SUCH restriction in RAC: you can access data to
> ANY partitioned table from ANY other node, at ANY time, regardless
> of which node(s) crashed and whatever is being done to recover.
> 0 second impact to acess data, complete transparency.

It depends on what kinds of accesses are being attempted against any data affected for as long as instance recovery is occurring. Received on Fri Feb 18 2005 - 08:25:39 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US