Jim Kennedy wrote:
> "Joel Garry" <joel-garry_at_home.com> wrote in message
> news:91884734.0406251500.5a5706f8_at_posting.google.com...
>
>>Hans Forbrich <forbrich_at_yahoo.net> wrote in message
>
> news:<QAJCc.8624$E84.8447_at_edtnps89>...
>
>>>omlet_at_omlet.org wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>End of thread!
>>>
>>>Is that a promise? If so, thank you.
>>
>>Well, there is one more issue that hasn't been addressed yet. I
>>haven't seen any evidence that the registered trademark of OMLET
>>actually is registered at uspto.gov. Now, I admit that just because I
>>haven't found it doesn't mean it doesn't exist - maybe I just couldn't
>>do the search right (although searching for Oracle and finding ORACLO9
>>and "WE DID NOT INVENT ORACLE TRAINING. WE PERFECTED IT! (ABANDONED)"
>>were kinda funny), although it wasn't in the browse function either.
>>Or maybe they forgot to actually register it. Or maybe the US
>>government doesn't like spam either. Or maybe it's registered in some
>>other country. Or maybe some other planet.
>>
>>The race is on!
>>
>>jg
>>--
>>@home.com is bogus.
>>Why harvest from usenet?
>>http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040624/news_1b24aol.html
>
>
> I think the best thing is to just put him in your kill file and be done with
> it. He adds nothing of any value to this and is not a professional in any
> sense of the word.
>
> He is a bad egg. (sorry just couldn't resist.) Into the kill file he goes.
> Jim
Unfortunately some people do the spammer's work for them by continuing
these threads as free advertising when what they should do is just label
the posts as spam and refuse to go to the spammer's web site.
--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Sat Jun 26 2004 - 11:05:36 CDT
