Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: tough choices

Re: tough choices

From: Serge Rielau <srielau_at_ca.eye-be-em.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:42:36 -0400
Message-ID: <cb6hjs$9hb$1@hanover.torolab.ibm.com>


Actually partitioning (DB2 UDB for LUW calls is organization to curb confusion) of a table is orthogonal to partitioning of the database. Let's use multi-dimensional clustering (MDC) as one example of "organization" since it is supported in DB2 UDB for LUW at present. MDC is supported in DB2 + DPF. What happens is that first the table is hash partitioned across the database partitions, then MDC kicks in and clusters the data in extends (which are a subdivision of a tablespace). Now, you can add "range partitioning" or "fragmented tables" to that and you end up with a hierarchie.
First comes database partitioning, then comes range partitioning and finally multidimensional clustering.

I'm not certain if adding anny other partitioning but hash on the database level is a good idea. It invites data skew and would be a maintenance nightmare to add more database partitions.

Cheers
Serge

-- 
Serge Rielau
DB2 SQL Compiler Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Received on Mon Jun 21 2004 - 06:42:36 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US