Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: OMLETv4 The Ultimate Visual Real Time Oracle Monitoring Tool
amjadd_at_uop.edu.jo (omlet v4) wrote in message news:<604b7892.0406160311.227d65e3_at_posting.google.com>...
> "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com> wrote in message news:<40cf4d3f$0$20514$cc9e4d1f_at_news-text.dial.pipex.com>...
> news:<40c8c691$0$20517$cc9e4d1f_at_news-text.dial.pipex.com>...
> cause> > > Please enlighten me? What is type
> > > > wrong results even in 9205 with decode,it can cause type comilation?
> > >
> > I see! You really deserve a medal for correctly explaining this. I > thought it ryhms with your status quo: mutilations!
Dang, I thought he meant something about eating up performance :-)
>
> deal> > > >
> > > > with the symptoms and not the cause.
> > So am I! what is this world coming to?! >
Never trust an Andorean.
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/aliens/article/70538.html
>
> > I might at somepoint decide to listen to fools; but the product does > not require this parameter set to anything. However once you turn > timed_stats on > you are querying lots of x$ tables and this is done using views, > select statements, etc. and you would reduce overhead. Not much > really; just in the range of few points 2%-5%. OMLET paints pretty > picture for you using SQL and that involves overhead. > > But I guess you already know that! The original message I posted for > "leading experts" I really did not mean YOU; Pinky. >
> > I thought you would list those as well: > > <quote> > " > 1) Visit Google and hunt around for advice. > > 2) Take nothing on face value: test it yourself to destruction. > > 3) Lurk here for a month or two, and try and pick up on the sort of > questions being asked, and ask yourself how *you* would answer them. > Then see what answers actually come through, and compare. When you're > feeling brave, post some of your answers and see how they are taken by > people. > > 4) Buy books. Anything with the names Jonathan Lewis, or Thomas Kyte > on the cover are *extremely* good bets for accurate advice. O'Reilly > are good. As are Apress (used to be Wrox) > > 5) Avoid anything that mentions OCP (Oracle Certified Professional). > The qualification is not worth a damn, and leads you straight into > myth territory. > " > </quote> > > I wonder what Oracle or OCPs feel about your accusations. Let me get > this, you publish all this on your web site and you are a PINKY > angel!?
Well, as an OCP, and someone who watched it spring into existence and has followed it closely, I'd say he's right, although I am starting to see it in job postings, and have posted previously what I think the usefulness is. As for the rest, I think most anyone from Oracle who has followed his posts would see he is more reasonable than you. I wouldn't be surprised if Oracle OCP management is aware of what has been said here. I think they care, too, even if only to keep the revenue stream up. And perhaps some read even the worst comments about OCP here as constructive criticism.
>
> > I am just follwing you lead; PINKY! You are not worth your PINK case. >
> > newsjunkies are not my market! I mean newsjunkies who lurk here or > there for a month or two! and again not you PINKY. I solicited > "leading experts" help and review which I think I got none. I expected > what you and people like PINKY would answer. Actually I am having FUN > especially with PINKYs! Give it a rest!
Let's see. You made yourself a nuisance in a newsgroup and now are complaining that they didn't help. Is that really fun? Could the real problem here not be the group?
jg
-- @home.com is bogus. http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040616/news_1n16spam.htmlReceived on Wed Jun 16 2004 - 17:28:56 CDT