Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: MS SQL Server Evaluation
Howard J. Rogers wrote:
>>RAC is not OPS. There is not a single line of OPS code in RAC as far as >>I know. It is a completely different animal built on the fact that >>everyone agrees that OPS was a good concept and a bad implementation.
Clues or no clues ... I have good reasons for stating that it is a completely different code base. There are some aspects of clustering that are just the nature of clustering so of course the names and the functionality are the same. But to extend that to assume as you have done that RAC is OPS with knobs on is not correct.
> That's presumably why Oracle expended considerable effort in getting 9i
> release 2 to coordinate sequences across instances, then, yes?
I don't work for Oracle and I don't make decisions for them. If I did Ray Lane might still be there driving Larry crazy. But there are plenty of simple workarounds for sequences if one thinks it through.
> It is easy to trot out trite answers in this forum. It is rather different
> in the real world. Business decisions are not always capable of being
> subject to such simplistic analysis.
If you are calling what some of Oracle's largest RAC customers are doing "trite answers" then I plead guilty and will serve time.
> That's all.
> HJR
-- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)Received on Sat Mar 13 2004 - 11:15:53 CST
![]() |
![]() |