Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Newbie question: SQL*Plus command to see number of query result rows
You are asking if it´s possible to remove the basic function of Sql*plus.
You can remove the header "STUDENT_ID" using this command: set heading off; And you can remove all feedbacks ie. "3 rows selected" by using this command: set feedback off;
But you can not remove the results, since they are the once you are requesting in your select statement.
Why not use:
select count(1) from ( your joined statement );
Or try using a cursor.
You can cut script below and save it to <name>.sql and execute it in
Sql*plus.
Remember to replace <Your joined statement.> with, well guess...¨
Declare
Cursor A1 is
<Your joined statement.>
r1 A1%rowtype;
cnt number;
Begin
cnt := 0;
Open A1;
Loop
Fetch A1 into r1;
Exit when A1%notfound;
cnt := cnt + 1;
End loop;
Close A1;
dbms_output.put_line('Result: '||cnt);
End;
/
---- END CUT ----
Regards
Martin M. Hansen
"Lara" <larroyo114_at_yahoo.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:73447077.0403130816.3bf4ae67_at_posting.google.com...
> Hi, I have what I think is a simple SQL*Plus question, but I can't
> find the answer in any of my books.
>
> I'm trying to turn off SQL*Plus displaying the result of each row in a
> select statement, and just want to see the number of rows the select
> statement would generate. I'm trying to see if my select statement is
> correctly generating the correct number of rows. I know it should
> generate 154,280 rows, but it takes too long to sit here and wait to
> see the results if every row of the query result displays.
>
> In other words (in a shortened example), I currently have:
>
> SQL> Select student_id from student;
>
> STUDENT_ID
> ----------
> 391
> 392
> 393
> 3 rows selected.
>
>
> Is there any command I can use to get:
> SQL> Select student_id from student;
>
> 3 rows selected.
>
>
> p.s. I don't think I can use COUNT because there are multiple joins
> and subqueries throughout the select.
>
> Thanks!
Received on Sat Mar 13 2004 - 11:20:16 CST
![]() |
![]() |