Re: Infamous JRE Installation Problem with 9i Again. :-(

Ok, now I'm thinking that the ISO images I downloaded from Oracle are bad. This happens on EVERY system I try regardless of the OS. I've tried it on Win2000 Server, Win2000 Pro, WinNT 4.0, before service packs and JRE, After service packs and after JRE, ALL with the exact same performance. It happens with both Oracle 9i and 8i in each case and it happens even if I copy the CD to my hard disk and run the setup from there.

I suppose I'll try downloading again, but right now I'm just about to forget the whole thing and assume that a lot less people out there run Oracle than I previously thought, because with such a buggy installer nobody must be able to even install the darn thing let along run it. :-\

"Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message news:3d8988f1$0$1291$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net...
> "Brad Melendy" <brad_at_techknow.biz> wrote in message
> news:ic6i9.60$dd4.61267_at_news.uswest.net...
> > Hi Tom,
> > Thanks very much for your reply. Here are the details: (which are very
> much
> > the same that I have read all over the place):
> >
> > As soon as I plop the 9i install CD into the drive, it auto runs and I
> click
> > INSTALL. Within a couple seconds, I get a message:
> >
> > "The Java Runtime Environment was not found at
> > c:\docume~1\admini~1\locals~1\temp\orainstall\jre\bin\jrew.exe. Hence,
the
> > Oracle Universal Installer cannot be run. Please visit
> > http://www.javasoft.com and install JRE version 1.1.7 or greater and try
> > again."
> >
> This *isn't* the P4 problem. It looks to me as if you have (or have had)
an
> installation of JRE on you machine. I would see if there are any traces of
> another JRE install (in the path or registry) and remove them before
> retrying.
>
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> Audit Commission UK
> *****************************************
> Please include version and platform
> and SQL where applicable
> It makes life easier and increases the
> likelihood of a good answer
>
> ******************************************
>
>
Received on Thu Sep 19 2002 - 12:03:27 CDT