Re: Oracle 7 performance on Nt or UX

From: Terry Dykstra [TeamPS] <no_spam_tdykstra_at_cfol.ab.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 13:00:43 -0600
Message-ID: <35c0c26b.0@news.cadvision.com>

We've moved our database from hp-ux to nt, using Oracle Workgroups (way cheaper than Enterprise). Our tables range from just 10 to 5 million rows. Performance has been very good. On the downside, Oracle is not as stable as the unix version.

--
Terry Dykstra [TeamPS]
Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.
See you at the Powersoft Conference in L.A. http://www.sybase.com/Events/psuc98/index.html

John Ma wrote in message <35BF6B74.C5_at_hp.com>...
>Hi,
>
>
>Currently, we plan to move our Oracle database server to a new box. We
>try to evaluate buying HP-UX or Window NT and find out performance/$$
>ratio. on different options.
>
>Our database has about 40 tables; 3 tables has around 60,000 rows, all
>others are about 1,000 to 10,000 rows. Select and Insert/Update are
>equally the same hit. Currently we have 50 Oracle workgroup licenses on
>Window NT.
>
>Does anyone has some suggestions? or does anyone knows some benchmark
>result I can reserach on? Any information will help. I am really
>appreciated. Thank you.
>
>
>
>John
Received on Thu Jul 30 1998 - 14:00:43 CDT