Re: three listeners, one for each instance ???

OK I'd agree, but if you have a client with different versions of the database on the same box or two or more essential databases running at the same time it can mean more than one listner process is required. Sure support may say one only but this is not always possible in the real world.

Dominic

MMK Productions wrote:

> I called support on this back in 96 and they said 1 listener per machine
> (assume 1 ver of Oracle and 1 oraclehome) was best. I don't remember why.
> From a maint. point of view, it would be easier because I have one
> listener.ora to maint.
>
> Dominic Lancaster wrote in message <35AC82B0.61A788ED_at_bimberi.com.au>...
> >Good point, I left out that bit,
> >
> >I'd like to test: one install of Oracle (with one Oracle Home and three
> >instances)
> >(sort of implies three listeners started individually)
> >
> >On the extreme end, I'd like to see if I can have two listeners,
> >one Oracle Home, two instances under one listener and one under the
> >other
> >listener (two listeners started)
> >
> >Dominic
> >
> >Dominic Baines wrote:
> >
> >> > for each of three db's on the same AIX system (all run the same
> >> version
> >> > of Oracle, 7.3.2)
> >>
> >> Is that one install of Oracle with one oracle home and three instances
> >> or
> >> three installations each with it's own instance. I ask because I've
> >> seen it
> >> setup both ways before.
> >>
> >> Dominic
> >
> >
> >
Received on Mon Jul 20 1998 - 06:46:21 CDT