Re: Some plonker typed rm temp.dbf AAARRGGHHH!

From: MotoX <rat_at_tat.a-tat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 08:02:25 +0100
Message-ID: <900918062.14862.0.nnrp-01.c2de712e@news.demon.co.uk>

I also much prefer raw, as long as I've got access to a good LVM.

MotoX.

OraSaurus wrote in message ...
>In article <35AE3C44.2451_at_eds.com>, greg.moye_at_eds.com wrote:
>>Good point Sergei, but when it comes to Oracle types, you just about
>>have to pry their cold, dead fingers off their cooked files. Start
>>talking about raw disk and their eyes just start to glaze over.
>>
>>Personally I'm a little short of sympathy too, being the Informix (very
>>raw oriented) bigot that I am...(he says ducking for cover).
>>
>>Greg
>
>Excuse me? What makes you think that "Oracle types" are stuck on
>cooked files? I've been putting Oracle databases into production for
>almost 10 years and the vast majority of them are on raw. Oracle
>Parallel Server won't even work unless everything is raw - redo logs,
>control files and datafiles. Who have you been talking to?
Received on Mon Jul 20 1998 - 02:02:25 CDT