Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Optimal Hardware for Oracle 8 and Express on NT server
Your disks wont be the bottleneck , if this is Express on NT then CPU will
be your bottleneck.
Those disks are fast enough to cater for any builds that might happen (A single disk can handle the i/o chucked out by an Express server during a build) IF you intend to have more than 40 connections - bump up the memory. Try to add memory to have a page pool on the Express server of at least 10% of the size of you cubes. (i.e. you are not using the RAM/RAA approach). If you are using the RAM/RAA approach try to add memory to cache at least 10% of the size of your index/data tablespaces. (i.e. on a 20GB database , 2GB of RAM is best). I really suggest adding as much memory as you can - max it out - memory is real cheap and the performance gains really outweigh any purchase costs. Do not choose a RAID system for disks that hold any cube files. RAID disks really slow down the cube builds. Upgrade to Express 6.2 ASAP. Tune the express server - the defaults are lousy. Make sure that you do not kill your disks with fragmentation by setting the extent management parameters under Express Server. Do not use a database server as an app server - buy a cheap system for this purpose. Max the cache on the RAID system if you choose RAID.
Post your message to to comp.databases.olap...
Hope this helped - I've been there.
Regards
Adrian
David R wrote in message <6o05gs$kus_at_news-central.tiac.net>...
>I am in the process of purchasing a new server. I have narrowed my choices
>down to 2 configurations and I can't decide which will be optimal for
>running Oracle Server 8 and Oracle Express Server on NT 4.0. Basically, it
>will be an App server.
>Configuration 1:
> Dual 400 Pentium II processers with 256Meg memory
> 4 9.1GB ultra SCSI 7,200 rpm disks with RAID 5 16Megs cache
>Configuration 2:
> Dual 333 Pentium II processors with 256Meg memory
> 4 9.1GB ultra-wide SCSI 10,000 rpm, disks with RAID 5 16Megs cache
>Trade-offs:
> Faster CPUs and slower disks or
> Slower CPUs and faster disks (with more bandwidth)
>Any advice would be much appreciated. Also, are the 10,000rpm Seagate
>Baracuda drives reliable?
>Please respond to: elutjen_at_randp.com
>
>
Received on Wed Jul 08 1998 - 16:46:05 CDT
![]() |
![]() |