Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Runaway java.exe when using Net8 Easy Config
I have noticed on NT 4.0 Server that all JAVA related applications no
longer
work after I installed Oracle 8 Enterprise Server. I couldn't launch
the
database assistant or any of the other assistants. It also screwed up
my Netscape
Communicator on another NT Server where every time I hit a site that has
Java
I can watch the CPU utilization hit 100% and stay there. The only thing
I can do is
end the application.
Isn't it fun to be on the BLEEDING edge of technology? :)
Carl Christianson
mhuber wrote:
> I have seen a variation of the same thing on my NT 4.0 workstation. In
>
> my case though, java.exe eats up a ton (24M) of free memory. Easy
> Config will work, but it sucks up alot of memory, and when I close it,
>
> the java.exe will stick around. I do not have Designer 2000 installed,
> I
> only have Oracle 8 Enterprise Edition. I have no suggestions other
> than
> a liberal use of the end process button in the task manager.
>
> The other thing I have noticed about Easy Config is that the "Test"
> function has stopped working. It worked when I first installed, but
> now
> I get an error whenever I try to test a new connection. The connection
>
> will work, just not from within easy config. It might be that the
> connection is dying because it can't get any memory.
>
> Mark Altenbernd wrote:
>
> > I have recently installed Oracle 8 on a Pentium 133 running NT
> > Workstation. Orcale 7.3.2 had been installed previously, and
> > subsequent
> > to installing Oracle 8, I installed Designer 2000 1.3.2. Now when I
> > try
> > to initiate Net8 Easy Config, java.exe is launched and immediately
> > pegs
> > CPU usage at 100%; there is no other apparent action, that is,
nothing
> >
> > appears in the UI to indicate that Net8 has been started. The
java.exe
> >
> > that runs comes from the \ORANT\JRE11\BIN directory.
> >
> > Has anyone else seen this behavior? Does anyone have any
suggestions?
> > Any help will be appreciated.
Received on Thu Oct 16 1997 - 00:00:00 CDT
![]() |
![]() |