Re: PeopleTools vs. std. Oracle

From: Rye1 <rye1_at_netunlimited.spamnyetnet>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 23:06:33 -0400
Message-ID: <35E37BB9.E9F6ABFE@netunlimited.spamnyetnet>

Oops. When replying please drop "spamnyet" from the email address.

Rye1 wrote:

> We are blessed with some PeopleSoft implementors who have told their
> manager that "all Oracle administration must be done with PeopleTools"
> including adding of data files, changing extent specs, adding
> tablespaces, etc. Not knowing a lot about PeopleSoft, this claim seems
> to have a high BS content as PeopleSoft should not care about data
> files, etc. What I'm looking for is battle experience with this type
> of setup to verify / reject the "need" for doing everything in
> PeopleTools.
Received on Tue Aug 25 1998 - 22:06:33 CDT