Re: Viability of OL 9.x and OpenELA

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:03:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAORjz=PbvaCLtxH6C5sEt_pBatWc18bR9nid4nm6+fWTNb59qA_at_mail.gmail.com>



I was browsing Oracle-L and saw this has no replies.

Perhaps you could better explain your concerns.

For instance, what is meant by "future reverse-engineered versions of OL"

Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist Principal Consultant at Pythian
Oracle ACE Alumni
Pythian Blog
http://www.pythian.com/blog/author/still/ Github: https://www.pythian.com/blog/technical-track/author/jared-still <https://github.com/jkstill>
Personality: http://www.personalitypage.com/INTJ.html

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 9:25 AM dougk5 <dougk5_at_cox.net> wrote:

> We will soon need to upgrade and/or replace several servers currently
> running OL7.9 that are nearing EOL. My question is twofold:
>
> 1. Upgrade to OL 8.10 or to 9.x? In theory 9.x would have a longer
> supported live span, however...
> 2. What is the viability of OpenELA and future reverse-engineered
> versions of OL? Should I cut my losses and move from OL to RHEL 9 now?
>
> Interested in your opinions on this matter.
>
> Regards,
> Doug
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Aug 12 2024 - 18:03:27 CEST

Original text of this message