Re: question about progress of shrink operation
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 00:14:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CALH8A92FpfSNodEvZ=pbtrfRzOMxgK0rwtAhTL2+zZ9sc3Gapw_at_mail.gmail.com>
shrinking securefiles are a new feature in 23c
for anyone interested, please have a look at
DBMS_SPACE.SECUREFILE_SHRINK_MANUAL
I had no chance to make a reason out of if yet, so that's all I can
provide; sorry!
Martin
Am Sa., 27. Jan. 2024 um 21:09 Uhr schrieb Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>:
> +42.
or DBMS_ADBTASK_ADMIN.RUN_TASK_MANUAL('Auto SF Shrink');
(you might find a job ORA$_ATSK_AUTOSFSHK)
>
>
>
> Likewise if conditions are correct for you to copy to a new location to
> effectively “shrink” rather than making shrink work, a reasonable amount of
> work should go into the optimization of the details about your LOB storage
> in the destination. The storage choices should not affect the ability to
> copy from your current source to a new destination, but they may make a
> significant change in the storage footprint in the destination.
>
>
>
> IF memory serves and IF a substantial number of your lobs should no longer
> be logically changed, things effectively like pctfree for “regular” block
> storage might be set very small for the copy in of those now unmutable
> lobs, and then be set optimally for change of your still mutable lobs
> before they are copied in. Don’t trust my memory on this, especially for
> more recent releases. A change from basicfile in the original to securefile
> in the destination may well be more important than anything else if the
> current lobs are basicfile.
>
>
>
> Notice in particular than zero of what I have written changes or
> challenges what JL has written about getting shrink to work at all.
>
>
>
> mwf
>
>
>
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Lewis
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 27, 2024 1:43 PM
> *To:* ORACLE-L (oracle-l_at_freelists.org)
> *Subject:* Re: question about progress of shrink operation
>
>
>
> A question I forgot to ask - are your LOBs securefile or basicfile, and
> what are your logging, caching, and "storage in row" settings. Again, it
> might make a difference.
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan Lewis
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 08:42, Laurentiu Oprea <laurentiu.oprea06_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> What will happen with progress of a shrink operation of a CLOB if it fails
> due to various reasons like for example undo space. Will it be all lost or
> partially lost or no lost progress?
>
>
>
> THank you.
>
>
-- Martin Berger Oracle ♠ martin.a.berger_at_gmail.com _at_martinberx <https://twitter.com/martinberx> ^∆x http://berxblog.blogspot.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sun Jan 28 2024 - 00:14:50 CET