Re: The retention time with oracle flashback logs are exceeded than db_flashback_retention_target?

From: Leng <lkaing_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 18:37:00 +1000
Message-Id: <09EB43B1-0EC8-45C6-AFEF-61B3E9D3FEAF_at_gmail.com>

db_flashback_retention_target

Is simply a target, not a hard rule. The size of your fra and tx will determine how much flashback logs are kept

> On 24 Jun 2023, at 8:09 pm, Quanwen Zhao <quanwenzhao_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> db_flashback_retention_target

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Jul 19 2023 - 10:37:00 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: yudhi s: "Steps for performance tuning/debugging"
Previous message: Chris Taylor: "Dataguard Sanity Check Please - One-Node Primary to RAC Standby (19.17)"
Next in thread: Quanwen Zhao: "Re: The retention time with oracle flashback logs are exceeded than db_flashback_retention_target?"
Reply: Quanwen Zhao: "Re: The retention time with oracle flashback logs are exceeded than db_flashback_retention_target?"
Maybe reply: Hemant K Chitale: "Re: The retention time with oracle flashback logs are exceeded than db_flashback_retention_target?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message