Re: Some weird phenomenons on oracle data guard physical standby on 11g?

From: Andy Sayer <andysayer_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 07:01:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CACj1VR5=UiFZf-PvnyhmFNuGYv8nYoG69W-GWSnWOYm=Yu9JJQ_at_mail.gmail.com>



Running 11g on production is a weird phenomenon.

The important thing to know is if dataguard is working? Is it supposed to be real time apply? Is it real time applying?

What you’ve said doesn’t raise any alarm bells with me.

Thanks,
Andy

On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:31 AM, Howard Latham <howard.latham_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Are they part of the dB. ? Are they the same size?
>
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, 14:15 Quanwen Zhao, <quanwenzhao_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello my oracle friends :-),
>>
>> I've found out some weird phenomenons on oracle data guard physical
>> standby on 11g of production system on my customer.
>>
>> - The status are all showing *CLEARING* on 9 number of redo log files
>> and the status is *CURRENT* on another redo log file (*the group
>> number is from 11 to 20*).
>>
>>
>> - The total *11* number of standby redo log files (*the group number
>> is from 21 to 31*) have always switched (*the status is from
>> UNASSIGNED to ACTIVE*) on only between *21* and *22* and the rest of
>> 23 - 31 seem to not have been their turn forever. I've observed it from
>> alert log.
>>
>> Those two number of descriptions above is normal? At the same time I've
>> glanced at Oracle 19c Data Guard Physical Standby, the status are always
>> *UNUSED* (never showing CLEARING and CURRENT) on redo log files, 11g and
>> 19c has a different action?
>>
>> Any ideas for this? Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Quanwen Zhao
>>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jun 01 2023 - 16:01:12 CEST

Original text of this message