Re: MS Defender for OL7 Oracle DB servers
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 11:17:00 +0400
Message-ID: <CAGLGTvMe2QoftrFwisCSrVrMD9awdfdwVYAUxzdz2behLfkpnw_at_mail.gmail.com>
Thats great to hear that it can work without any issues as sooner or later ask will come back again
On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 at 00:26 Niklas Iveslatt <niklas.iveslattx_at_arisant.com> wrote:
> I usually don't speak up much but I am very passionate about security and
> the protection of people's data in general. I have to say that some kind of
> antimalware should be installed on all servers, especially on database
> servers. It is 2022 for goodness sake and we have security breaches galore.
> All the leading anti-malware vendors have tons of configuration options -
> both for real-time and scheduled scan configurations.
>
> In the last many years I have not seen a case where running antimalware,
> properly configured, caused issues. This includes deployments we have done
> on ExaCS, DBCS, and other very Oracle-centric solutions.
>
> The requirement needs to be to have anti-malware installed on all servers
> and then configure it to work with the workload. We as IT people have the
> responsibility to enforce this in my view.
>
> In the case of ms defender, it is a highly intelligent engine that is just
> getting better and better over time and I see no reason why this should not
> work - we just finished up an OCI project where this was deployed
> successfully in a Peoplesoft environment running Oracle databases.
>
> Niklas Iveslatt
> Senior Partner
>
>
> Arisant LLC ~ http://www.arisant.com
> 44 Inverness Dr. E Bldg. C Suite 2 ~ Englewood, CO 80112
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/44+Inverness+Dr.+E+Bldg.+C+Suite+2+~+Englewood,+CO+80112?entry=gmail&source=g>
> mobile: 303.882.4461 ~ main: 303.330.4065 ~ fax: 888.889.0155
>
> Need to send me something securely? *Click here*
> <https://arisant.sendsafely.com/u/niklas.iveslatt>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 12:37 PM tefetufe <coskan_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Despite being on Exacc and ASM and exclude all binary folders for grid
>> and db ms defender managed to give us trouble and I finally convinced the
>> requester team not to have defender on db systems
>>
>> Issues
>> high cpu usage for the process (last thing you want is virus scan bursn
>> expensive cpu cycles)
>> I had a cluster crash where defender was looking so suspicious when issue
>> was happpening, maybe I just saw the excuse that I needed :)
>>
>> Since defender is gone did not see any single stability problem
>>
>> Also on vmware it gave us big hassle when we wipe huge db sitting on xfs
>> to refresh it. It was blocking the files to be deleted and all of our
>> refret automations failed due to being defended by defender.
>>
>> My suggestion is avoid at all cost if you can
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 19:29 Tim Gorman <tim.evdbt_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Rich,
>>>
>>> As documented HERE
>>> <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/defender-endpoint/microsoft-defender-endpoint-linux?view=o365-worldwide#common-applications-to-microsoft-defender-for-endpoint-can-impact>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> *Common Applications to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint can impact*
>>>
>>> *High I/O workloads from certain applications can experience performance
>>> issues when Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is installed. These include
>>> applications for developer scenarios like Jenkins and Jira, and database
>>> workloads like OracleDB and Postgres. If experiencing performance
>>> degradation, consider setting exclusions for trusted applications, keeping **Common
>>> Exclusion Mistakes for Microsoft Defender Antivirus
>>> <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/defender-endpoint/common-exclusion-mistakes-microsoft-defender-antivirus>**
>>> in mind. For additional guidance, consider consulting documentation
>>> regarding antivirus exclusions from third party applications.*
>>>
>>>
>>> Personally, I think any sort of "protective" software running on a
>>> database server is another good reason to use Oracle ASM, as A/V software
>>> generally "protects" only filesystem-based files, and do not recognize (or
>>> bother with) block-special or character-special devices. Just my opinion,
>>> when you can't prevent A/V software from being used in the first place.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps...
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> -Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/4/2022 6:50 AM, Rich J wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> Anyone run into any issues running MS Defender on their Oracle DB
>>> servers on Linux? This would be on OL7 for now (mostly 7.7).
>>>
>>> One would think that the Oracle datafile directories plus the ADR tree
>>> should be excluded. I'm just wondering if there's other common "gotchas"
>>> that others have run into.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rich
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> --
>> Coskan GUNDOGAR
>>
>> Oracle DBA
>>
>> Email: coskan_at_gmail.com
>> Blog: http://coskan.wordpress.com
>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/coskan
>> Linkedin: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/coskan
>>
> --
-- Coskan GUNDOGAR Oracle DBA Email: coskan_at_gmail.com Blog: http://coskan.wordpress.com Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/coskan Linkedin: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/coskan -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sat Mar 05 2022 - 08:17:00 CET