Re: Query on Real application testing

From: Ls Cheng <exriscer_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:58:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ2-Qb9OaofmR3kuLZgMXoOngp7WCoH9D7KOO=rVhMgLgLVx0w_at_mail.gmail.com>



Hi

I think you should capture RAT for at least 3, 4 hours of workload. In the old days when load tests were using tools such as Mercury Loadrunner there was a stage in the beginning which we called ramp-up which is the warming up stage you are describing to bring in live-like conditions. During ramp-up response times are higher and are taken into account when analyzing the data.

So to simplify things, run AWR every 30 minutes and consider the first 30 minutes as your ramp-up stage.

Thanks

On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 12:32 PM Lok P <loknath.73_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, We are planning to use the real application testing feature of Oracle
> for capturing and replaying production workloads to see the actual impact
> of one of our coming versions and hardware upgrades. We have one question-
> As before each workload replay the RAT database has to be flashed back to
> the point in time where we have captured the workload from. So will that
> flashback, remove everything from the RAT DB buffer cache and also
> everything will be wiped out from the storage server flash cache? And in
> that case the replay may not mimic the exact impact as the cache warmup
> will be adding additional overhead to the resource and time and thus it may
> not be a good comparison of before and after upgrade behaviour of RAT
> database. Can you please confirm if this is the correct understanding and
> how we should replay then to avoid this cache warmup thing? And if any
> other RAT system related resources can also deviate the figures?
>
> Regards
> Lok
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sun Oct 31 2021 - 22:58:11 CET

Original text of this message