Re: sql monitor
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 06:57:05 +0200
Message-ID: <a0b24818-3d66-9b0c-d010-4b104dea3b00_at_bluewin.ch>
if it is a serial execution, I do prefer runtime stats most of the time 
over sql monitor.
 
Am 13.05.2021 um 06:00 schrieb Henry Poras:
It is simpler and easier to get the main points.
Besides, does your query contain some unusual sql code, a special 
clause, anything like that?
> Let's see. I tried:
>
> 1. v$sql_monitor on both nodes and also gv$sql_monitor. My sql_id did 
> not appear
> 2. ran repot_sql_monitor from both nodes. Nothing
> 3. ran the alter system set events 'trace[sql_mon.*] prior to 
> executing my sql. Didn't see any trc file in diag which looked useful. 
> I also did a grep there for keswx which diid not show up in any recent 
> traces.
> 4. I did not yet force parallel
> 5. David, this is 12.1.0.2, not 19c, but I will give sqlt a look. I 
> remember checking it out a while back, but don't remember much.
>
> Henry
>
> brought to you by: Larry as Lucy and rsm as the football.
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 8:50 AM David Barbour 
> <david.barbour1_at_gmail.com <mailto:david.barbour1_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Is the query using a global temp or private temp (19c) table? 
>     Since these are populated at runtime, the optimizer can (and has
>     in my experience) create a totally off-the-wall plan.
>
>     Something else you might consider for analysis is sqlt.  I found
>     if OEM and the native tables/research functionality aren't
>     providing answers, sqlt can really help in pinpointing issues. 
>     It's easy to install and you'd be amazed at the detail.
>
>     On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 4:53 PM Henry Poras <henry.poras_at_gmail.com
>     <mailto:henry.poras_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hi Sayan,
>         Thanks for checking back. I've been busy with some other
>         stuff, but hope to have some more information on this
>         either tonight or tomorrow.
>
>         Henry
>
>         On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 6:17 PM Sayan Malakshinov
>         <xt.and.r_at_gmail.com <mailto:xt.and.r_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             Hi Henry,
>
>             Did you get an RTSM trace? It should contain keswx* functions
>
>             On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:36 PM Jonathan Lewis
>             <jlewisoracle_at_gmail.com <mailto:jlewisoracle_at_gmail.com>>
>             wrote:
>
>                 Two possibilities, though neither seems likely.
>
>                 a) gv$sql_plan_monitor (and gv$sql_monitor) may be one
>                 of those (rare) views that DOESN'T run cross-instance,
>                 so if the query is running on instance but the session
>                 you're using to look at the monitor report is connect
>                 to another instance you wouldn't see it.
>                 b) there is another hidden parameter that limits the
>                 number of plans that can be monitored at any one time.
>                 This is _sqlmon_max_plan, default 80, and is the
>                 number of plans PER CPU.  Maybe something has jammed
>                 the counter of v$sql_monitor at the maximum so your
>                 query can't be captured.
>
>                 Regards
>                 Jonathan Lewis
>
>
>
>                 On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 17:50, Henry Poras
>                 <henry.poras_at_gmail.com <mailto:henry.poras_at_gmail.com>>
>                 wrote:
>
>                     I think I'm missing something silly here, but I
>                     don't know what.
>
>                     I'm having an issue with getting a sql_monitor
>                     report and I'm running (well, ran) out of ideas on
>                     what to try next. I have a long running query (~2
>                     hours on 12.1.0.2) for which I am trying to get a
>                     report using dbms_sqltune.report_sql_monitor. The
>                     result returned is always empty. So I tried:
>                     - setting _sqlmon_max_planlines to 1000 (execution
>                     plan is ~600 lines using display_cursor('adaptive'))
>                     - checked statistics_level which is correct. It is
>                     TYPICAL
>                     - control_management_pack_access is
>                     DIAGNOSTIC+TUNING (also correct)
>                     I thought it might be aging out of memory since it
>                     ran long, but running the report and looking in
>                     gv$sql_monitor after 2, and 10-15 minutes still
>                     showed nothing. Adding a MONITOR hint to the CTE
>                     and body of the sql didn't help. Neither did
>                     running an ALTER SYSTEM SET EVENTS 'sql_monitor
>                     [sql:...] force=true'.
>                     I can't figure out why I am getting nothing.
>                     Anybody have any ideas?
>
>                     Thanks.
>                     Henry
>
>
>
>             -- 
>             Best regards,
>             Sayan Malakshinov
>             Oracle performance tuning engineer
>             Oracle ACE Associate
>             http://orasql.org <http://orasql.org>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu May 13 2021 - 06:57:05 CEST
