Query with Bind variables hangs but hard coded literals works fine

From: Steve Wales (AddOns) <"Steve>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 01:23:43 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR20MB141937C98DAE8FF034B25046F1450_at_DM5PR20MB1419.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>

Sorry for the length of this up front. Trying to get as much relevant info into the initial post as people might need to point me where I'm getting the problem

I have an Oracle 18c (18.8 if it matters) Standard Edition 2 database on Linux 7..

There's a query from the ERP system that's hanging the online screen and getting http timeouts because it's not completing in a timely fashion.

I pulled the text of the query from v$sqltext and the bind variables from v$sql_bind_capture.

The query is searching a parts catalog for colloquial names for parts.

If I take the query, replace the bind variables from the query with string values and run it through SQLPLUS, it runs in about 0.7 seconds and returns the expected values.

If I instead leave the bind variables in the query, and in SQLPLUS define variables and then assign values via exec :v1 := 'SOMEVALUE', then it sits and spins 57 MINUTES before returning the exact same result set.

The execution plans change slightly but significantly as well.

The tables:
MSF100 is a stock catalog table. Contains all stock items that the business catalogs across all properties MSF170 is a table that busts up the global catalog among assorted business units MSF120 contains the colloquial names. If I search on "ACTUATOR" it can return me all the stock codes that have "ACTUATOR" as a colloquial name. I assume rownum <= 20 is specified because that's how many rows fit on a screen at a time.

select * from( select * from MSF100 CATALOG where (CATALOG.stock_code in (select MSF170Rec.stock_code from MSF170 MSF170Rec, MSF100 MSF100Rec where (MSF100Rec.stock_code = MSF170Rec.stock_code))) and ( exists (select 1 from MSF120 MSF120Rec where (MSF120Rec.colloq_code = CATALOG.stock_code and MSF120Rec.colloq_name like '%ACTUATOR%' and MSF120Rec.colloq_type = 'S' )) or exists (select 1 from MSF120 MSF120Rec where (MSF120Rec.colloq_code = CATALOG.template_id and MSF120Rec.colloq_name like '%ACTUATOR%' and MSF120Rec.colloq_type = 'I' ))) and (CATALOG.stock_status <> 'X' ) order by CATALOG.stock_code ) where ROWNUM <= 20;

When using the static values (and I apologize in advance for what proportional fonts do the formatting below)

(Estimated plans generated just by doing good old "explain plan for")

| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 3243 | | 5756 (1)| 00:00:01 |

|*  1 |  COUNT STOPKEY               |            |       |       |       |            |          |


|   2 |   VIEW                       |            |     1 |  3243 |       |  5756   (1)| 00:00:01 |


|*  3 |    SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY     |            |     1 |  3243 |       |  5756   (1)| 00:00:01 |


|   4 |     VIEW                     | VM_NWVW_2  |     1 |  3243 |       |  5756   (1)| 00:00:01 |


|   5 |      HASH UNIQUE             |            |     1 |   785 |       |  5756   (1)| 00:00:01 |


|*  6 |       FILTER                 |            |       |       |       |            |          |


|   7 |        NESTED LOOPS SEMI     |            |     1 |   785 |       |  5751   (1)| 00:00:01 |


|*  8 |         HASH JOIN            |            |     1 |   775 |  5632K|  5751   (1)| 00:00:01 |


|   9 |          INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| MSF170_PK  |   262K|  2559K|       |   265   (1)| 00:00:01 |


|* 10 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL   | MSF100     | 74750 |    54M|       |  2466   (1)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN    | MSF100_PK  | 83735 |   817K|       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |


|  12 |        INLIST ITERATOR       |            |       |       |       |            |          |


|* 13 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN     | MSF12001I1 |     1 |    49 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter(ROWNUM<=20)

3 - filter(ROWNUM<=20)
6 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "MSF120" "MSF120REC" WHERE

              ("MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_CODE"=:B1 AND "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_TYPE"='S' OR
              "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_CODE"=:B2 AND "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_TYPE"='I') AND
              "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_NAME" LIKE '%ACTUATOR%'))
   8 - access("CATALOG"."STOCK_CODE"="MSF170REC"."STOCK_CODE")
  10 - filter("CATALOG"."STOCK_STATUS"<>'X')

11 - access("MSF100REC"."STOCK_CODE"="MSF170REC"."STOCK_CODE") 13 - access(("MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_CODE"=:B1 AND "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_TYPE"='S' OR

              "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_CODE"=:B2 AND "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_TYPE"='I'))
       filter("MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_NAME" LIKE '%ACTUATOR%')

When using bind variables (Yes, I know that the columns are all defined as CHAR instead of VARCHAR2. No, I don't know why the vendor of this application insists on presenting their database that way):

variable v1 char(24 char)
variable v2 char(1 char)
variable v3 char(24 char)
variable v4 char(1 char)
variable v5 char(1 CHAR)

variable v6 number

exec :v1 := '%ACTUATOR%          ';
exec :v2 := 'S';
exec :v3 := '%ACTUATOR%          ';
exec :v4 := 'I';
exec :v5 := 'X';
exec :v6 := 20;

select * from( select * from MSF100 CATALOG where (CATALOG.stock_code in (select MSF170Rec.stock_code from MSF170 MSF170Rec, MSF100 MSF100Rec where (MSF100Rec.stock_code = MSF170Rec.stock_code))) and ( exists (select 1 from MSF120 MSF120Rec where (MSF120Rec.colloq_code = CATALOG.stock_code and MSF120Rec.colloq_name like :v1 and MSF120Rec.colloq_type = :v2 )) or exists (select 1 from MSF120 MSF120Rec where (MSF120Rec.colloq_code = CATALOG.template_id and MSF120Rec.colloq_name like :v3 and MSF120Rec.colloq_type = :v4 ))) and (CATALOG.stock_status <> :v5 ) order by CATALOG.stock_code ) where ROWNUM <= :v6;

| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 3243 | 192K (1)| 00:00:08 |

|*  1 |  COUNT STOPKEY              |            |       |       |            |          |


|   2 |   VIEW                      |            |     1 |  3243 |   192K  (1)| 00:00:08 |


|*  3 |    SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY    |            |     1 |   755 |   192K  (1)| 00:00:08 |
|*  4 |     FILTER                  |            |       |       |            |          |


|   5 |      NESTED LOOPS SEMI      |            |     3 |  2265 |   192K  (1)| 00:00:08 |


|*  6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL     | MSF100     | 63173 |    45M|  2466   (1)| 00:00:01 |


|   7 |       VIEW PUSHED PREDICATE | VW_NSO_1   |    12 |    24 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |


|   8 |        NESTED LOOPS         |            |   262K|  5120K|     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |


|*  9 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN   | MSF100_PK  |     1 |    10 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 10 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN    | MSF17001I1 |   262K|  2560K|     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN   | MSF120_PK  |     1 |    49 |   476   (1)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter(ROWNUM<=TO_NUMBER(:V6))

3 - filter(ROWNUM<=TO_NUMBER(:V6))
4 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "MSF120" "MSF120REC" WHERE

              "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_TYPE"=:V2 AND "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_NAME" LIKE :V1 AND
              "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_CODE"=:B1 OR "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_TYPE"=:V4 AND
              "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_NAME" LIKE :V3 AND "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_CODE"=:B2))
   6 - filter("CATALOG"."STOCK_STATUS"<>:V5)
   9 - access("MSF100REC"."STOCK_CODE"="CATALOG"."STOCK_CODE")
  10 - access("MSF170REC"."STOCK_CODE"="CATALOG"."STOCK_CODE")
       filter("MSF100REC"."STOCK_CODE"="MSF170REC"."STOCK_CODE")
  11 - filter("MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_TYPE"=:V2 AND "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_NAME" LIKE
              :V1 AND "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_CODE"=:B1 OR "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_TYPE"=:V4 AND
              "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_NAME" LIKE :V3 AND "MSF120REC"."COLLOQ_CODE"=:B2)

The CPU cost on this second query is orders of magnitude greater than the other way. I can only assume that this is why my CPU on the server goes into overdrive as it sits and thinks forever before the http server throws it's hands up and gets sick of waiting.

This database was just upgraded to 18.8 from 12.1.0.2 over the weekend. (Vendor hasn't certified the product for 19c yet, hence the upgrade to 18c). This was not a problem with 12.1.0.2 SE2.

One last thing, since this is an ERP package, I can't change the code / insert hints / build new indexes (well I suppose I could do that but the next release upgrade would blow it away anyway). Any solution really has to be about a config / parameter change (but if an index would work, I suppose I'd be willing to try it as a work around for the time being).

Thanks in advance for any pointers. I'm hoping that there's an init parameter or something that was new in the 12.2 engine from 12.1 that might be causing the problem.

Steve

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Nov 26 2019 - 02:23:43 CET

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message