Re: General Quey question.
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 15:55:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGV8MGohnxfB=uirQ9DPfAuZadQQL52DFr_6=zFYY54sS5dMkg_at_mail.gmail.com>
Not meaning to be rude here but you missed an important point: Oracle does
not guarantee the order of the returned rows unless an ORDER BY clause is
used in the query.
Take a look as this quite old AskTom entry
<https://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:6257473400346237629>
.
So, no, you probably haven't done anything wrong with the new box, everything is working as intended and now that you added the required clause, you should be totally fine.
Cheers.
[image: Pythian] <http://www.pythian.com/>
*Jose Rodriguez* | Oracle Database Consultant | [image: LinkedIn]
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/pythian>
*t* +1 613 565 8696 <+1+613+565+8696> *ext.* 1393
*m* +34 607 55 49 91 <+34+607+55+49+91>
jrodriguez2_at_pythian.com
*www.pythian.com* <https://www.pythian.com/>
[image: Pythian] <https://www.pythian.com/email-footer-click>
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 15:48, Storey, Robert (DCSO) < RStorey_at_dcso.nashville.org> wrote:
> Here is the scenario.
>
>
>
> Old 9i database. Records were created and inserted into table years ago.
> It’s basically a look-up/status table with those rows never being deleted,
> just certain columns updated.
>
>
>
> Have a query in a stored procedure cursor that provides a list of values
> from that table based on one of the column values. No order by clause
> needed. Returns the records back to stored procedure in the order that
> they were entered in the table. All is good and as expected.
>
>
>
> Migrate the database to 11g. Have a development box that, using an export
> from the 9i, I did an import to the 11g. cursor still returns the records
> in the right order.
>
>
>
> Now I migrate to my new production box. Same import used for the dev box.
> All goes good.
>
>
>
> Almost 30 days to the hour after the import and go live, this query starts
> returning the records back in a completely different order. The order
> returned makes absolutely no sense. Causes some annoyances to the users.
> Applying an “order by value” to the cursor query and all is back to
> goodness.
>
>
>
> There have been a couple other screens in my application that prior to
> going to production box would return data back in a “entered order” that
> are now returning the data out of that order. The application allows the
> user to sort the columns of data returned so it’s a simple click to reorder.
>
>
>
> I’ve looked at the rowids, and the rowids for the rows for the “out of
> order” return set are also out of order.
>
>
>
> Thoughts? Did I miss something setting up my new box?
>
>
>
> Robert Storey
>
> Database Administrator
>
> Nashville Sheriff’s Office
>
> 615-880-1967
>
>
>
-- -- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Dec 07 2018 - 15:55:37 CET