Re: From ORACLE-L to DATABASE-L?
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:40:30 -0400
Message-ID: <7cbda753-f149-8312-739b-3f7d511da934_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:40:30 -0400
Message-ID: <7cbda753-f149-8312-739b-3f7d511da934_at_gmail.com>
On 03/15/2018 11:57 AM, Niall Litchfield wrote:
> agree with all of the above. I disagree with the suggestion though.
>
> Firstly ORACLE-L has, currently, a high signal-noise ratio. A *very*
> high signal-noise ratio. I strongly suspect the widening of scope to
> other RDBMS systems (I assume that is what Tim intended rather than
> DBMS) would reduce this.
Why are we paying the list administrator?
-- Mladen Gogala Database Consultant Tel: (347) 321-1217 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sat Mar 17 2018 - 00:40:30 CET