RE: Oracle High Availability Question(s)

From: Pete Sharman <peter.sharman_at_westnet.com.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:20:06 +1100
Message-ID: <00b301d3a5e1$f84ce550$e8e6aff0$_at_westnet.com.au>



UGH, NO, RUN VERY, VERY FAR AWAY! 😉  

I hate that damn configuration, with a vengeance.  

Pete  

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Hans Forbrich Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 06:11 AM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Oracle High Availability Question(s)  

You might want to look up 'stretch RAC'

One useful article is Oracle's wwhite paper http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/products/clustering/overview/extendedracversion11-435972.pdf

disclaimer: My opinion, not my employer's /Hans

On 2018-02-14 11:59 AM, Scott Canaan wrote:

Currently, we don’t have a license for RAC, therefore we aren’t using it. We have one application in particular that is required to be available as close to 7 x 24 x 365 as possible. One other requirement is that the redundancy includes physical disk, with one set of disks in one location and the redundant set in another location. In looking at RAC, it appears that a shared disk (or disk group) is used which doesn’t satisfy the second requirement. So far, I have not found a description of RAC that shows it using more than one disk / disk group for redundancy. What is the best way to accomplish the second requirement?

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Feb 14 2018 - 23:20:06 CET

Original text of this message