Re: oracle on VM or non-VM ?!!
From: Neil Chandler <neil_chandler_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:45:14 +0000
Message-ID: <DB6PR10MB181589B1717138991D961516853A0_at_DB6PR10MB1815.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: ora_kclosson_at_yahoo.com <ora_kclosson_at_yahoo.com> Sent: 27 November 2017 20:45
To: neil_chandler_at_hotmail.com
Cc: jprem_at_outlook.com; tim.evdbt_at_gmail.com ; iggy_fernandez_at_hotmail.com ; andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: oracle on VM or non-VM ?!!
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:45:14 +0000
Message-ID: <DB6PR10MB181589B1717138991D961516853A0_at_DB6PR10MB1815.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Lets say the client wants to remove RAC.
With DG + FSFO you get HA and DR in one, with an approximate 1 minute outage whilst the observer switches the Primary and Standby roles. You can add onto that the corruption checking and auto-healing you get with DG, low impact backup from DR site, etc.
You lose the zero-outage patching capability, zero downtime server outage and horizontally scaling for writes but the cost and complexity reduction may be worth it in your circumstance.
Neil Chandler
Database Guy
From: ora_kclosson_at_yahoo.com <ora_kclosson_at_yahoo.com> Sent: 27 November 2017 20:45
To: neil_chandler_at_hotmail.com
Cc: jprem_at_outlook.com; tim.evdbt_at_gmail.com ; iggy_fernandez_at_hotmail.com ; andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: oracle on VM or non-VM ?!!
RAC to DG+FSFO!!
On Nov 27, 2017 1:57 AM, Neil Chandler <neil_chandler_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
I do agree with much of what has been said,
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Nov 28 2017 - 11:45:14 CET