Re: Overhead of Dataguard

From: Norman Dunbar <oracle_at_dunbar-it.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:31:40 +0000
Message-ID: <9361D795-74B1-408E-8E85-784A3FE66DF9_at_dunbar-it.co.uk>



Morning Jack,

I don't have an answer for the overhead question, sorry.

However, you mention having to turn on force logging - do you run a primary and standby at the moment without force logging? If so, you probably don't have a usable standby. See http://qdosmsq.dunbar-it.co.uk/blog/2014/10/beware-of-the-silent-database-killer/ for the gory details of what can happen.

In a past contract, I suffered from the problem documented due to a third party running nologging in their batch code, and the system having been set up without force logging (an oversight of a previous dba, I hasten to add!). Turning logging on actually made little difference.

I would imagine that force logging would have less effect than the need to run a backup after every nologging action to be honest. However that would depend on what was actually done during the nologging phase.

Hth.

Cheers,
Norm.

--

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Tue Nov 14 2017 - 09:31:40 CET

Original text of this message