Re: Oracle IP and Unwrapping PL/SQL Code

From: Stefan Knecht <knecht.stefan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 23:07:47 +0700
Message-ID: <CAP50yQ89gv23ANwFC_Go5c5g=hoSndiLVF20cfKXqmCwsN3T4w_at_mail.gmail.com>





Patents are expensive. World-wide patents are insanely expensive for a smaller enterprise. It's literally not doable.

It's not quite that simple, I think.

Plus, I don't think that the only reason to want to wrap code is IP - another reason I see is: "don't mess with it". Imagine if Oracle's internal PL/SQL code wasn't wrapped. People are already tampering with the data dictionary (because they can see it) - if they could do the same to the packages ...

I think those websites - if for ethical reasons only - shouldn't exist.

It's fine to be able to purchase this as a service, if there is a legitimate need. But in such a public and free manner, I don't agree with it.

Stefan

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 8:18 PM, <rob_at_oraclewizard.com> wrote:

> There is even a plugin for sql developer to unwrap pl/sql. If you want to
> protect your code, then copyright your work and use patents where
> appropriate.
>
> Robert P. Lockard
>
> On October 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM Rumpi Gravenstein <rgravens_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I see that there are websites out there now that will unwrap wrapped
> PL/SQL for you for free. See https://www.codecrete.net/UnwrapIt/. Is
> Oracle or anyone working on taking these sites down? Does Oracle have an
> official stance on how to better protect any IP you may have in PL/SQL code?
>
> --
> Rumpi Gravenstein
>
>
>
> Robert P. Lockard
>
> A letter of reprimand is better than no mail at all. Nobody ever made
> history or changed the world by only worrying about his or her career.
>
> (cell) +1.571.276.4790
>
> (blog) http://www.oraclewizard.com
>
> _at_YourNavionPilot
>
>

-- 
//
zztat - The Next-Gen Oracle Performance Monitoring and Reaction Framework!
Visit us at zztat.net | Support our Indiegogo campaign at igg.me/at/zztat |
_at_zztat_oracle





-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Oct 13 2017 - 18:07:47 CEST

Original text of this message