RE: Is nfs reliable?

From: Robert Freeman <rfreeman_at_businessolver.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:34:04 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR10MB07447F646B5416011A35F651D5590_at_BY2PR10MB0744.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>

Mike,

We Run our RAC databases using NFS as the shared media for datafiles. We have yet to have a failure because of NFS. We don’t use shared software directories however, just local directories. My personal preference is for local software.

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Michael Cunningham Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 12:02 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists org <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Subject: Is nfs reliable?

I had someone tell me today that nfs should not be relied on and it should not be used for a shared mount that needed to be reliably available.

Has anyone ever hear this before?

--

Michael Cunningham
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Fri Jun 03 2016 - 17:34:04 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tim Gorman: "Re: Is nfs reliable?"
Previous message: Jeremy Schneider: "Re: Is nfs reliable?"
Maybe in reply to: Chitale, Hemant K: "RE: Is nfs reliable?"
Next in thread: Michael Cunningham: "Re: Is nfs reliable?"
Reply: Michael Cunningham: "Re: Is nfs reliable?"
Reply: Jeremy Schneider: "Re: Is nfs reliable?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message