Re: Standy database on standard edition
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:18:43 -0600
Message-ID: <51B94823.7080401_at_gmail.com>
On 12/06/2013 5:14 PM, De DBA wrote:
> Say what? RMAN is included in SE, isn't it? It is in XE even. Why
> would you not be allowed to use it? --
In Joel's defense, I've seen customers who insist on their own (usually SAN or snapshot-based) backup method and absolutely refuse to use RMAN.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:18:43 -0600
Message-ID: <51B94823.7080401_at_gmail.com>
On 12/06/2013 5:14 PM, De DBA wrote:
> Say what? RMAN is included in SE, isn't it? It is in XE even. Why
> would you not be allowed to use it? --
In Joel's defense, I've seen customers who insist on their own (usually SAN or snapshot-based) backup method and absolutely refuse to use RMAN.
In one case a few years back, the customer refused to *allow* RMAN.
Politics, in a tech environment, is always curiously fun, in an insane
kind of way.
/Hans
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jun 13 2013 - 06:18:43 CEST