Re: Stupidity or sequences?

From: <gints.plivna_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:50:46 +0300
Message-Id: <3443CDA5-9742-438B-A5E6-ADA8913386C3_at_gmail.com>

A while ago I wrote an article The curse of gapless sequences http://gplivna.eu/papers/gapless_sequences.htm Gints

On 2013. gada 12. apr., at 18:24, Johan Eriksson <valpis_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I think most of us has seen someone trying to be smart or trying to gain
> database independencies by not using oracle sequence but instead roll their
> own system by using a table, and a row for each "sequence".
> Almost every attempt on this I yet have seen has been plagued with row lock
> contention or other concurrencies, scalability zero...
>
> Have anyone actually seen some implementation of this kind work when load
> increase?
>
> /johan
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Fri Apr 12 2013 - 19:50:46 CEST