Re: Unwanted SQL Developer inverse connection storming
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:50:54 -0600
Message-ID: <516438DE.5000808_at_gmail.com>
On 09/04/2013 9:13 AM, Jeff Smith wrote:
> That way if you're at AT&T you don't get any funny looks when someone's
> over your shoulder and notices you have a connection called 'Verizon'
Believe me, it wouldn't be 'funny looks'. It would be 'walk to the door', and perhaps 'see you in court' with some of the fraud detection groups in the customer base.
> I could write that up in a blog post if that would help.
Yes, that would be appreciated.
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:50:54 -0600
Message-ID: <516438DE.5000808_at_gmail.com>
On 09/04/2013 9:13 AM, Jeff Smith wrote:
> That way if you're at AT&T you don't get any funny looks when someone's
> over your shoulder and notices you have a connection called 'Verizon'
Believe me, it wouldn't be 'funny looks'. It would be 'walk to the door', and perhaps 'see you in court' with some of the fraud detection groups in the customer base.
> I could write that up in a blog post if that would help.
Yes, that would be appreciated.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Apr 09 2013 - 17:50:54 CEST