Re: Sizing Redo log files
From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:01:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAORjz=OvOwQAEjjFLtHWq7yRJ+dLnCHR9R9o+6t5mCb2kyFeOQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:47 AM, <Joel.Patterson_at_crowley.com> wrote:
> Or, if the sustained throughput to the arch destination is less than the
> sustained redo rate, make sure there are enough redo logs so that the lgwr
> never circles around to a current log.... because the rate is not a steady
> full steam ahead all the time rate.
>
> (I'm over reaching here as devils advocate... :) ).
>
> Anyway, good catch. I think I read it and understood what he was saying
> without visualizing the actual statements in my head, because I
> instinctively knew that what you said 'kind of had' to be the case and it
> simply translated that way.
>
>
Thanks Guys - like I said, I was tired. At least understood what I meant to say. :)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:01:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAORjz=OvOwQAEjjFLtHWq7yRJ+dLnCHR9R9o+6t5mCb2kyFeOQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:47 AM, <Joel.Patterson_at_crowley.com> wrote:
> Or, if the sustained throughput to the arch destination is less than the
> sustained redo rate, make sure there are enough redo logs so that the lgwr
> never circles around to a current log.... because the rate is not a steady
> full steam ahead all the time rate.
>
> (I'm over reaching here as devils advocate... :) ).
>
> Anyway, good catch. I think I read it and understood what he was saying
> without visualizing the actual statements in my head, because I
> instinctively knew that what you said 'kind of had' to be the case and it
> simply translated that way.
>
>
Thanks Guys - like I said, I was tired. At least understood what I meant to say. :)
Jared
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jun 26 2012 - 16:01:40 CDT