Re: Oracle Security Alert for CVE-2012-1675 - 10g extended support
From: Martin Berger <martin.a.berger_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 22:13:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CALH8A905Y-LsCpk57nDKmzssQos6uWtpq1e1vqS+wOO6++YKgQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
To be honest, I like the idea of different Services also for single instances.
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 22:13:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CALH8A905Y-LsCpk57nDKmzssQos6uWtpq1e1vqS+wOO6++YKgQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
To be honest, I like the idea of different Services also for single instances.
But the "... forgets to edit the sid_list_listenerName..." is a problem of weak deployment processes, not of a patch. (I'd say)
Martin
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Martin Bach
<development_at_the-playground.de> wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> just wondering - is there a reason for those on the list to turn off
> dynamic registration of listeners in single instance? What I can see go
> wrong is that a DBA works on a ticket, creates a database and promptly
> forgets to edit the sid_list_listenerName () ... and then is surprised
> that no one can connect.
>
> I was thinking of using the IPC method which to me looks a lot simpler
> to implement. Applying patches is always tricky since no one wants to
> take the outage.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri May 04 2012 - 15:13:01 CDT