Re: Shareplex
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:07:56 +0100
Message-Id: <9409E6C6-AD0B-4F28-8C3F-CB038795AE52_at_vishalgupta.com>
I have used Shareplex in past back in 9i and 10g days when Oracle AQ could scale up to replicate 10-15million transaction/day and still keep data latency low. Shareplex was great for Oracle to Oracle replication. I dont know about the price though.
If you are looking for something cross RDBMS, then you could also go for GoldenGate.
On 27 Jul 2011, at 17:07, Amaral, Rui wrote:
> We had it at my previous employer a few years ago as well. It worked but expensive and a bit of a memory hog in our environment.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Bill Ferguson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:05 PM
> To: RStorey_at_dcso.nashville.org
> Cc: oracle-l-freelists
> Subject: Re: Shareplex
>
> Tried it several years ago and finally dropped it. It was SUPER
> expensive, and we (myself and the Quest folks) could never get it to
> work correctly with Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 Server. Everything
> they tried still failed, so after spending $65K on it and over a year
> of effort, we dropped it.
>
> You are also prety much correct in what it does, though the setup for
> it was far less than dataguard.
>
> --
> -- Bill Ferguson
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
> NOTICE: Confidential message which may be privileged. Unauthorized use/disclosure prohibited. If received in error, please go to www.td.com/legal for instructions.
> AVIS : Message confidentiel dont le contenu peut être privilégié. Utilisation/divulgation interdites sans permission. Si reçu par erreur, prière d'aller au www.td.com/francais/avis_juridique pour des instructions.
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jul 28 2011 - 16:07:56 CDT