RE: Shareplex

From: Amaral, Rui <Rui.Amaral_at_tdsecurities.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:07:37 -0400
Message-ID: <B38858412AFF9F4098331DE549A77449062CC6F7D1_at_EX7T2-SV05.TDBFG.COM>

We had it at my previous employer a few years ago as well. It worked but expensive and a bit of a memory hog in our environment.

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Bill Ferguson Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:05 PM
To: RStorey_at_dcso.nashville.org
Cc: oracle-l-freelists
Subject: Re: Shareplex

Tried it several years ago and finally dropped it. It was SUPER expensive, and we (myself and the Quest folks) could never get it to work correctly with Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 Server. Everything they tried still failed, so after spending $65K on it and over a year of effort, we dropped it.

You are also prety much correct in what it does, though the setup for it was far less than dataguard.

--

• Bill Ferguson
  --
  http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

NOTICE: Confidential message which may be privileged. Unauthorized use/disclosure prohibited. If received in error, please go to www.td.com/legal for instructions. AVIS : Message confidentiel dont le contenu peut être privilégié. Utilisation/divulgation interdites sans permission. Si reçu par erreur, prière d'aller au www.td.com/francais/avis_juridique pour des instructions.
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Wed Jul 27 2011 - 11:07:37 CDT