RE: DISM in 11.2.0.2 on Solaris 10
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:31:49 -0400
Message-ID: <304F58144267C5439E733532ABC9A3A11230C5D7_at_USA0300MS02.na.xerox.net>
David,
Thank you for the feedback.
I have already validated all DISM related parameters from SQL*Plus as well as by creating PFILE from SPFILE and none of the below mentioned parameters are set. The Oracle analyst that I am working with has filed a BUG with development (BUG# 12771380).
Thanks
Amir
-----Original Message-----
From: David Robillard [mailto:david.robillard_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 9:38 AM
To: Hameed, Amir
Cc: oracle-l mailing list
Subject: Re: DISM in 11.2.0.2 on Solaris 10
Hello Amir,
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:59:03 -0400
>
> I have a two-node Oracle RAC 11.2.0.2 environment running multiple
> databases on M3000 servers. Both servers are identical in
configuration
> with the exception that server A has twice the amount of physical
memory
> than server B (64GB versus 32GB). The following parameters are NOT set
> in the SPFILE and therefore, DISM should not be enabled:
>
> SGA_TARGET
> SGA_MAX_SIZE
> MEMORY_MAX_TARGET
> MEMORY_TARGET
>
> However, when I run the "ps" command at the OS, I observe the
following:
Take a look at appendix D < Administering Oracle Database on Solaris > in the < Oracle Database Administrator's Reference 11g Release 2 (11.2) for Linux and UNIX-Based Operating Systems >. It's stated how and why Oracle uses Intimate Shared Memory on Solaris 10. (I'd give you the URL, but the documentation site appears to be down at the moment).
If you "create pfile=''/tmp/pfile.txt'' from spfile;" can you see if the above parameters are set? If so, that might explain things.
HTH, David
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Jul 20 2011 - 09:31:49 CDT