Re: Using CRS in Active - Passive Configuration

I have used Oracle Clusterware 10.2 for active passive database on Sun Solaris, 2 nodes though

--
LSC

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:59 PM, John Thompson <jhthomp_at_gmail.com> wrote:



> I'm currently testing a 3 node RH Linux active/passive cluster.  We have 4

> db's running on 1 node, 4 db's running on the 2nd node and using the 3rd as

> the passive node.  Using ASM for storage.  This is working really nice

> especially for managebility purposes as it takes only 1 command and just a

> matter of minutes to move a db from 1 node to another.  I was wondering if

> anyone else is doing this sort of thing and if so, have you had any

> problems?

>

> 3 Dell 2950's w/32gb memory each running Redhat Linux 4 U 6.  Using

> 11.1.0.6 for CRS and ASM.  Different flavors of 10.2 for the databases

>


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l