Using CRS in Active - Passive Configuration

From: John Thompson <jhthomp_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:59:10 -0500
Message-ID: <11d63ad10807290759j12677a5cu7218b93c8bf5d05@mail.gmail.com>

I'm currently testing a 3 node RH Linux active/passive cluster. We have 4 db's running on 1 node, 4 db's running on the 2nd node and using the 3rd as the passive node. Using ASM for storage. This is working really nice especially for managebility purposes as it takes only 1 command and just a matter of minutes to move a db from 1 node to another. I was wondering if anyone else is doing this sort of thing and if so, have you had any problems?

3 Dell 2950's w/32gb memory each running Redhat Linux 4 U 6. Using 11.1.0.6for CRS and ASM. Different flavors of 10.2 for the databases

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Jul 29 2008 - 09:59:10 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: genegurevich_at_discover.com: "merge into an empty table"
Previous message: dba1 mcc: "Re: migrate 32 bit to 64 bits error when use "dbua"????"
Next in thread: LS Cheng: "Re: Using CRS in Active - Passive Configuration"
Reply: LS Cheng: "Re: Using CRS in Active - Passive Configuration"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message