Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 9207 in prod
Hi Thomas and list
We have continuos core dumps with 9207 in linux 32 bit. We update to 9208 and solve the problem.
Wed Aug 16 17:07:28 2006
Errors in file /oracle/admin/udump/spyro_ora_6763.trc:
ORA-07445: se ha encontrado una excepción: volcado de memoria [kghlru()+56]
[SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x2
4] [] []
...
Sat Aug 19 10:05:02 2006
Errors in file /oracle/admin/udump/spyro_ora_12304.trc:
ORA-07445: se ha encontrado una excepción: volcado de memoria
[kgidlt()+1085] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x4] [] []
...
Tue Aug 22 09:24:13 2006
Errors in file /oracle/admin/udump/spyro_ora_9708.trc:
ORA-07445: se ha encontrado una excepción: volcado de memoria [kxsflh()+68]
[SIGSEGV] [Addr
ess not mapped to object] [0x20000010] [] []
...
Thu Aug 24 16:36:03 2006
Errors in file /oracle/admin/udump/spyro_ora_11927.trc:
ORA-07445: se ha encontrado una excepción: volcado de memoria [kghfrf()+65]
-----Mensaje original-----
De: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] En
nombre de Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
Enviado el: jueves, 14 de septiembre de 2006 14:36
Para: caseydyke_at_optusnet.com.au; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
CC: fairlie rego
Asunto: RE: 9207 in prod
We are using 9207 in both OLTP and warehouse environs. No problems for us.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of
caseydyke_at_optusnet.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:53 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Cc: fairlie rego
Subject: 9207 in prod
Folks,
Just trying to get a feel for community comfort w/9207 in prod. We're looking to get off 9204 and now have approval to proceed through the dev/uat/svt and prod envs. I say 9207 as our initial push occurred prior to the recent (Aug 24th) release of 9208 for our port (Solaris 64bit). The databases house OLTP and DW type apps in the multi-TB range. Note we're tied to 9iR2 due to vendor support.
We're still early enough in the game to choose 9208 - but 9207 should likewise be sufficient. We've got anecdotal evidence of "issues" w/9207, but nothing really concrete. Hence, I would like to see what the broader community thinks. Good, bad, indifferent ... ??
Any and all input will be greatly appreciated.
Thx,
Casey
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Sep 15 2006 - 01:46:12 CDT
![]() |
![]() |