RE: 9207 in prod

From: <Jay.Miller_at_tdameritrade.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:07:59 -0400
Message-ID: <DDCBD4EBE91C514287DCBCF303EAAFD75BF73D@prdhswsemlmb01.prod-am.ameritrade.com>

And we're fine with 9.2.0.7 (64 bit Solaris). The instance I'd love to get rid of is our bug-ridden 9.2.0.4 that the front-end vendor won't certify for anything later...

That said, if you have the chance to start with 9.2.0.8 why not have the latest bug fixes included?

Thanks,
Jay Miller
Sr. Oracle DBA
x68355  

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:36 AM To: caseydyke_at_optusnet.com.au; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Cc: fairlie rego
Subject: RE: 9207 in prod

We are using 9207 in both OLTP and warehouse environs. No problems for us.

---

This transmission may contain confidential, proprietary, or privileged information which is intended solely for use by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, copying or distribution of this transmission or its attachments is strictly prohibited. In addition, unauthorized access to this transmission may violate federal or State law, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1985. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the transmission and its attachments.

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of caseydyke_at_optusnet.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:53 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Cc: fairlie rego
Subject: 9207 in prod

Folks,

Just trying to get a feel for community comfort w/9207 in prod. We're looking to get off 9204 and now have approval to proceed through the dev/uat/svt and prod envs. I say 9207 as our initial push occurred prior to the recent (Aug 24th) release of 9208 for our port (Solaris 64bit). The databases house OLTP and DW type apps in the multi-TB range. Note we're tied to 9iR2 due to vendor support.

We're still early enough in the game to choose 9208 - but 9207 should likewise be sufficient. We've got anecdotal evidence of "issues" w/9207, but nothing really concrete. Hence, I would like to see what the broader community thinks. Good, bad, indifferent ... ??

Any and all input will be greatly appreciated.

Thx,

Casey
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Mon Sep 18 2006 - 15:07:59 CDT