>>>>>>Have you folks had any chance of trying out the different IO
>>>>>>schedulers in 2.6? The anticipatory one seems to be the
>>>ticket for
>>>>>>FTS-oriented systems. RH has an article on some
>>>benchmarks they did
>>>>>>that seems to indicate the cfq is best overall for Oracle:
Oh, I forgot to mention that these algorithms usually no-op out
on direct I/O, but we'll see. The whole bit about anticipatory is
all about readahead which is useless with direct IO because it has
not idea what to read.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Mar 15 2006 - 18:14:20 CST
