Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC

Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC

From: Maimon Oded <oded.maimon_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-12-29 19:42:32
Message-id: afc75c420512291042k4c20c93amd13b7951bfa02505@mail.gmail.com


i don't know what is StorageWorks Enterprise File Server Clustered Gateway, i was talking about something like NETAPP storage.

On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson wrote:
>
> what does "NFS of CFS" mean? Exporting a CFS? Yeah, that's
> being done. It's called the StorageWorks Enterprise File Server Clustered
> Gateway
> by HP. Up to 16 nodes of scalable NFS with transparent NFS client failover
> in the
> event a NAS head should fail. And when I say transparent, I mean it.
> Oracle
> CRS, and database processes have no idea that the NAS head serviing up
> their
> files has died. Not exactly the typical filer experience. Yeah, I know
> you can "cluster"
> and replicate filers. The HP EFS/CG requires no replication for this high
> availability/
> scalability. Want to know how I know ?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *Maimon Oded
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:16 AM
> *To:* oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> *Subject:* Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
>
> i know some companies that have RAC in site license. but let's change the
> discussion to something else.
>
> NFS of CFS?
>
> On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson wrote:
>
> > sometimes man bites dog
> >
> > :-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> > ] *On Behalf Of *rjamya
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:40 PM
> > *To:* tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee
> > *Cc:* ORACLE-L
> > *Subject:* Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
> >
> >
> > We are licensed for all rdbms products/options. We can use them
> > whenever ... so that helps.
> >
> > Rjamya
> >
> > On 12/28/05, Tanel Põder < tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Kevin is right, as much as I've seen none of the site licenses have
> > > had RAC
> > > included, most of my customers have even had to pay for partitioning
> > > extra
> > > (although discounted) price.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Received on Thu Dec 29 2005 - 19:42:32 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US