Re: TimesTen, anyone ?

Yes, good point. I should of stated that our purpose was to off load a component of the system we are doing with Oracle to something else. With Oracle we are able to perform 1500 per sec per CPU and I want do more transactions and save on Oracle licenses. Berkeley DB would be the longest path, because it's quite a different animal. You would have to do stuff in tuples. Where as EnterpriseDB and ANTs supports Oracle PL/SQL to a large extent and make transition much easier.

Regards,

On 8/15/05, Leandro Guimaraes Faria C. Dutra <ldutra_at_toyota.com.br> wrote:
>
> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org gravou em 2005-08-15 14:02:44:
>
> > We have looked into TimeTen when it was 3.4, and didn't get too far with
> it
> > in terms of evaluation. It was also costly at the time for us.
> > I have been look at the following now as an alternative to TimesTen:
> > o Berkeley DB
> > o Derby (formally cloudscape by Informix), open source
> > o Ants, looks very interesting.
> > o EnterpriseDB
>
> I'd be curious about how you compare them. Berkeley AFAIK is
> quite a different animal.
>
> Perhaps you'd be better served at looking not at low-end DBMSs,
> but for in-memory DBMSs.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l