Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 9.2.0.4 listener problems

RE: 9.2.0.4 listener problems

From: Thomas Jeff <jeff.thomas_at_thomson.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:06:43 -0500
Message-ID: <428BC948616D534DA0860EDF33F542AB17A4DE@INDYSMAIL02.am.thmulti.com>


We thought of that -- but updating the clients would be tough to do, since we
have a lot of 3rd party apps hitting the box. =20
We took one busy database out of the loop, and that improved things slightly,=20
ping times in the 40K now, where before the tnsping just sat there forever,=20
and now you can get in in about 30-40 seconds, compared to up to 15 minutes before:

[03-FEB-2005 10:01:00:480] nscon: doing connect handshake...
[03-FEB-2005 10:01:00:480] nscon: sending NSPTCN packet
[03-FEB-2005 10:01:36:705] nscon: got NSPTRS packet
[03-FEB-2005 10:01:36:706] nscon: sending NSPTCN packet      =20





-----Original Message-----
From: Hemant K Chitale [mailto:hkchital_at_singnet.com.sg]=20 Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:35 AM To: Thomas Jeff; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: 9.2.0.4 listener problems

Curious. Have you tried setting the listener to listen on another port ? Setup the listener.ora to use another port [say 1523 or 1621] other than=20
the default 1521.
{of course, you'd have to update the tnsnames.ora on the clients as well -- or you could test this with two seperate listeners on the two seperate ports}

Hemant

At 09:20 PM Thursday, Thomas Jeff wrote:
>To add to this. We shut down the 9i listener and fired up a 10g
>listener. The same
>problems persist. What happens is that it's fine for about 5 minutes
>(with the 10g
>listener) then the tnsping times drop off the table, and the slowdowns
>resume. It
>looks like some sort of load/resource contention issue.
>

Hemant K Chitale
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~hkchital

              =20

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Feb 03 2005 - 10:09:33 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US