RE: ASM/MetaLUN

From: Henry Poras <henry_at_itasoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:07:04 -0500
Message-ID: <000c01c4e922$972f8410$3800040a@itasoftware.com>

Thanks. Pete sounded upbeat about ASM a few days ago:) Maybe it's something in the water cooler.

This is mainly exploratory for now. Working through various options.

Henry

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jared Still
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 1:43 PM To: henry_at_itasoftware.com
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: ASM/MetaLUN

ASM is still rather bleeding edge.

If you're considering this for production use you may want to wait for 10gR2.

Jared

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:21:55 -0500, Henry Poras <henry_at_itasoftware.com> wrote:
> I have been reading through some EMC docs as well as Oracle ASM stuff,
> trying to understand what would be a reasonable setup (the recent
> Storage

...

-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Dec 23 2004 - 13:06:13 CST